Brian Doggett
Dr. Jordan Sanderson
Eng. 1123
3 Feb. 2011
Annotated Bibliography: Abstinence, Morality, and Other Words Public Schools Think Will Prevent Disease and Pregnancy.
“Abstinence-Only Education.” Issues & Controversies on File: n.pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 11 Sept. 2006. Web. 18 Jan. 2011.
This research paper focused on the positive and negative aspects of abstinence-only education as opposed to comprehensive sex education. It also focused on legislation that was passed to support abstinence–only classes for funding, and the effects it has on the decisions public school districts are making on whether or not to be part of this program. Also stated in this paper are the critical views of both advocates and non-supporters of abstinence-only education and comprehensive sex education, citing in their own personal opinion the benefits and downfalls of these programs.
This paper was unbiased in its research, and offered thorough information on both aspects involved in the decision on whether to support abstinence-only or comprehensive sex education. It offered validated knowledge about reformation of legislation passed to federally fund these abstinence classes in public schools, as well as the effects of teaching comprehensive sex education to the youth.
Statistics and facts in this paper were very useful in shaping and determining a central thought of how effective both abstinence-only education and comprehensive sex education are. The information offered in the area of legislation also proved helpful.
Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. “Accuracy, Efficacy And Ethics Of Abstinence-only Programs Questioned By Public Health Experts.” ScienceDaily 19 September 2008. Web. 25 January 2011.
Studies have shown that abstinence-only sex education programs are failing to produce a change in sexual teenage behavior, as well as providing falsified information about contraception and are violation of one’s human rights. These studies also show the origins of such programs are usually religiously founded.
Research was compiled by many different sources that are very credible in their field of social rights and ethics, but presented a biased opinion of non-support for abstinence, stating statistics and showing demographics of the growing trends of teens on a large scale view of programs nationwide, researching many, but only using a selected few.
Connolly, Ceci. “Some Abstinence Programs Mislead Teens, Report Says.” Washington Post 2 Dec 2004: A01. Web.
Ceci Connolly has shown that large amounts of youngsters that had participated in abstinence-only programs have learned about the misleading facts of sterility via abortion, genital contact could also result in pregnancy, and falsified facts about half of all gay male teens having positively tested for AIDS, through researching congressional staff analysis involving these programs. She also stated that many of these programs use scare tactics, or shame/fear based motives to push their points onto students.
In pointing out the shame or fear based classes in the teaching of sex education it was very pro-comprehensive sex education heavy. This research proved very helpful indeterring people from support of an abstinence-only approach, showing the misleading and falsified facts that are being taught in some federally funded sex education programs under federally funded and regulated abstinence only classes.
“How Pregnancy Effects Teens.” http://www.ygoy.com. n.pag., 10 Nov. 2009. Web.
This research showed the lasting effects of teen pregnancy on the health of the mother involved. These effects include, but are not limited to: Premature birth, low levels of prenatal care, nutrition deficiency, the risk of death being higher, and underdeveloped pelvis structure.
This research also looked at the socio-economic effects, stating that teens are generally poverty stricken, lack social support, affected educational status, lowered career goals obtained, and lowered marriage rates to the child’s father.
The website stated that due to early motherhood as a teen, drastic repercussions could occur. Both physical health and social standing is largely affected. The risk of unhealthy childbirth processes are more likely, and poverty, as well social support are a mainstay for most teen mothers.
Jess H. “Abstinence Breeds Ignorance.” Cornell Daily Sun 08 Apr. 2010, Web.
Cornell University science major, Jess H. researched the statistical findings of a New York Times article published and titled “Quick Response to Study of Abstinence Education.” In which the article talked of a research study finding of delay in age of sexual activity coming from abstinence over comprehensive education. After being weary of the results of these findings Jess H. researched the findings for herself, and found that this particular report was written with high overtones of support for abstinence and promoted falsified facts and self-reports as realistic data to help fill in the missing details of arguments against abstinence-only education.
Jess H. is a Cornell University science major and pro-comprehensive sex education supporter. In her research she aimed to discredit the journal article that was printed by the New York Times, and help show the misleading teachings and reports that are helping to keep abstinence-only education as a mainstay in school curriculum. She also states that most of these abstinence programs have Christian or religious overtones that shouldn’t be allowed in school.
In this article I found it very beneficial in creating the feel of how sexual education is more affected by outer sources than the curriculum itself. The findings of her research also helped to discredit abstinence-only based classes and show the infringement of rights of students.
Kliff, Sarah. “The Future of Abstinence.” Newsweek. 27 Oct. 2009: 13-14. Print.
Kliff focuses her research on a small suburban conservative town in McLennan County, Texas, where abstinence-only education is the mainstay of the curriculum, yet seems to be under impressions of losing federal funding. The Obama administration is pushing for a budget that is omits the teaching of abstinence-only classes, leaving grant recipients under question of what to do next. Even if a reinstatement of the proposed legislation passes, school districts are questioning the curriculum they will use. Stating that abstinence-only omitted certain and valuable info on sexual topics due to curriculum being federally provided and funded, the pulling of the funding has created a backlash of conflict on what is proper to teach to the youth.
Kliff approached both sides of this debate in a very just and verified manner, viewing both sides equally. Also interviewed were people from small conservative town, religious based in population density, as well as inner-city public schools and more diverse driven school districts that have used both abstinence-only and comprehensive sex educational curriculum.
“Sex Education.” Issues & Controversies on File: n.pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts on File News Service, 19 May 2008. Web.
This particular journal study focused on both sides of the debate over sex education in public schools. It proved heavy in statistical facts for both sides of the argument and covered topics of concern over teen sex, the federal responses to this, school condom programs, and what parts of which programs work. It also stated the concerns for contraception education usage, and showed constitutional issues that were being violated by both programs and the civil suits filed in different states with different outcomes per state.
In this journal article it stated that states should be allowed to pick their own educational programs without backlash concerning it funding by the federal government, as long as they aren’t in violation of civil liberties or individual rights. It also was a very unbiased approach to both topics, showing the pros and cons of all the topics the writings had covered.
I used the research to show the difference in curriculum between the two and help define some of the better aspects of comprehensive sex education, and show realistic research findings to show which educational standpoint is better in teaching the topic of sex to children.
Wilbert, Caroline. “Sexy TV: A Link to Teen Pregnancy.” http://www.webmd.com. WebMD Inc., 03 Nov. 2008. Web.
Caroline Wilbert argues for parents to curb what children watch on television, stating that television programming is teaching children to become more sexually active through what they see and what they are exposed to. It also focused on statistics of rates of teen pregnancies, and the amount of television watched and which programs were being viewed as a predictor for higher rates of teen pregnancies for both males and females. The research showed that television plays a large role in the outcome of sexual reproduction in teens.
The statistical findings in this proved helpful in showing how the media effects and shapes decisions for the youth, or leads them into experimentation based on what they see on television or portrayed in the media, Though very little supported Wilbert’s credentials, the research was published and verified by Pediatrics, and were based on a study that was conducted over a three year period with teens ranging in age from 12 to 17.